LOCAL / INC-2407-04
Telemetry 8 sec ago
HighInvestigatingStarted 14:31:08 · 18m 42s

Orders latency on payment dependency

p95 crossed 750 ms for 3 evaluation windows · orders-api → payments-api

Controlled scenario activeF-04 · 1,100 ms Orders-to-Payments dependency delay
Auto-clear in02:41
Affected pathOrders PaymentsInventory healthy
Orders p951,246 msBaseline 151 ms · +725%
Payment server p9542 msWithin normal range
Evidence window18:4214:26:08 → now
EVENT STREAM

Incident timeline

scenario

Scenario F-04 started

Dependency-path latency armed with a three-minute TTL.

metric

Orders p95 crossed 750 ms

First qualifying window · 31 requests sampled.

detection

Incident opened

High dependency latency persisted for three evaluations.

trace

Discriminating trace retained

Client 1,137 ms · paired server 42 ms.

diagnosis

Diagnosis validated

4 claims · 100% valid citations · mock/deterministic-v1.

mock · deterministic-v1
AI INFERENCE High confidence · 94%

Latency is on the dependency path,
not inside Payments.

The Orders client span is 27× slower than the paired Payments server span. Payments processes the request normally; delay is introduced before it reaches the service.

orders-api1,137 ms
+1,095 ms
payments-api42 ms
OBSERVED FACTSEvery claim cites retained evidence
01

Orders p95 increased to 1,246 ms from a 151 ms baseline.

02

The Orders → Payments client span took 1,137 ms.

03

The paired Payments server span completed in 42 ms.

RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP · READ ONLY

Inspect the dependency path, proxy, and network between Orders and Payments. Compare client/server span boundaries before reviewing the Payments deployment.

Limitations and confidence rationale

This deterministic diagnosis recognises the controlled failure mode. Confirm live network and deployment context before acting. Confidence is descriptive, not statistically calibrated.